Skip to content

PostgreSQL + Fintech

PostgreSQL Developer
for Fintech

Build bulletproof fintech databases with PostgreSQL. ACID transactions, 99.999% uptime, audit-ready. Scaled to $10B+ in transactions. Free database audit.

Key Insights

01

PostgreSQL's SERIALIZABLE isolation level prevents double-spending race conditions that REPEATABLE READ allows—critical for financial transactions where READ COMMITTED (the default) permits phantom reads that cause reconciliation nightmares.

02

For fintech audit requirements, PostgreSQL's logical replication can stream transaction logs to immutable storage in real-time, creating tamper-evident audit trails that satisfy regulatory retention requirements without impacting OLTP performance.

03

NUMERIC with explicit precision (not DECIMAL, not FLOAT) is the only acceptable type for money in PostgreSQL—NUMERIC(19,4) handles amounts up to 999 trillion with 4 decimal places, covering any currency including cryptocurrencies.

04

PostgreSQL's row-level security (RLS) enables multi-tenant fintech with database-enforced isolation—even application bugs can't access another customer's financial data because the database itself enforces tenant boundaries.

05

Partitioning transaction tables by date enables compliance-friendly data lifecycle management—archive partitions to cold storage after retention periods without complex ETL, and drop old partitions cleanly when legally permitted.

Fintech Regulations

Compliance requirements that shape technical architecture

Common Challenges

Problems I solve for clients in this space

Challenge

Transaction integrity and race conditions

Financial transactions require absolute integrity. Race conditions that cause double-spending, duplicate transfers, or balance inconsistencies are unacceptable.

Solution

SERIALIZABLE isolation for critical transactions. Explicit locking strategies for account balances. Database constraints that prevent negative balances. Idempotency keys to prevent duplicate processing.

Challenge

Audit trail and change tracking

Regulators require complete history of all changes to financial records. Who changed what, when, and why must be reconstructible.

Solution

Audit trigger functions capturing before/after states. Append-only audit tables with immutable storage. Logical replication to separate audit database. Cryptographic verification of audit integrity.

Challenge

Reporting performance vs OLTP

Financial reporting queries (monthly statements, regulatory reports) compete with transaction processing. Neither can suffer.

Solution

Read replicas for reporting workloads. Materialized views for complex aggregations refreshed on schedule. Partitioning enables efficient date-range queries. OLAP-optimized indexes on replicas.

Challenge

Multi-tenant data isolation

SaaS fintech serving multiple institutions must guarantee complete data isolation. A bug or query mistake can't expose one customer's data to another.

Solution

PostgreSQL Row-Level Security (RLS) with tenant context. Database-enforced isolation that application code can't bypass. Separate schemas or databases for high-security tenants.

Recommended Stack

Optimal technology choices for PostgreSQL + Fintech

Database

PostgreSQL 16+ with RLS

ACID compliance, SERIALIZABLE isolation, row-level security for multi-tenancy. Proven at financial institution scale.

Encryption

pgcrypto + TDE

Column-level encryption with pgcrypto for PCI scope reduction. Transparent Data Encryption for at-rest compliance.

Connection Pooling

PgBouncer

Transaction-mode pooling for serverless workloads. Essential for scaling connection count without exhausting database limits.

Monitoring

pg_stat_statements + Datadog

Query performance monitoring for SLA compliance. Alerting on slow queries affecting transaction latency.

Why PostgreSQL?

PostgreSQL is the default choice for fintech because it treats data integrity as non-negotiable. When you're processing financial transactions, you cannot accept 'eventual consistency' or 'best effort delivery.' PostgreSQL's ACID guarantees mean that when a transaction commits, the data is durably stored, consistent with all constraints, and visible to subsequent queries. SERIALIZABLE isolation level goes further, preventing the subtle race conditions that can occur even with REPEATABLE READ. Two concurrent transactions checking a balance and then debiting it will never both succeed if the combined debits exceed the balance—the database detects the serialization anomaly and rolls back one transaction. This isn't something you can implement reliably in application code. The financial data model maps naturally to relational databases. Accounts have balances. Transactions debit one account and credit another. Constraints ensure debits equal credits. Foreign keys maintain referential integrity. These aren't limitations—they're features that catch bugs before they become reconciliation nightmares.

My Approach

Fintech database projects start with understanding the transaction model and regulatory requirements. What are the transaction types? What consistency guarantees are required? What audit and retention requirements apply? These answers shape the schema design. I design schemas that encode financial constraints. Balance columns have CHECK constraints preventing negative values (for accounts that shouldn't go negative). Transaction tables have constraints ensuring debits equal credits. Idempotency keys prevent duplicate processing. These constraints are defense-in-depth against application bugs. For multi-tenant fintech, row-level security is my default pattern. Every query automatically filters by tenant without application code changes. Even a SQL injection attack can't access another tenant's data because the database itself enforces the boundary. This dramatically simplifies security audits. Performance testing uses realistic transaction volumes from day one to ensure the database handles peak load with margin to spare.

Investment Guidance

Typical budget ranges for PostgreSQL fintech projects

MVP

$25,000 - $60,000

Core functionality, essential features, production-ready foundation

Full Solution

$75,000 - $200,000

Complete platform with advanced features, integrations, and scale

Factors affecting scope

  • Schema complexity and transaction types
  • Multi-tenancy requirements
  • Audit and compliance depth
  • Performance and scalability requirements

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Services

Ready to discuss your project?

Let's talk about how I can help architect a solution tailored to your specific requirements and constraints.

START_CONVERSATION()

Not ready to talk? Stay in the loop.