Skip to content

TypeScript + SaaS

TypeScript Developer
for SaaS

Make your app blazing fast. TraceForge: 337x faster than Inkscape. PhotoKeep: 73% cost reduction. Load testing, profiling, edge deployment. Free performance audit.

Key Insights

01

Most performance problems are not where developers think—profiling almost always reveals that the actual bottleneck differs from intuition, making measurement essential before optimization.

02

The highest-impact optimizations are usually architectural, not code-level: adding a cache, denormalizing a query, or moving computation to background jobs outperforms micro-optimizations by orders of magnitude.

03

Database performance problems dominate most web applications—the N+1 query, the missing index, the unoptimized join accounts for 80% of slowness.

04

Performance optimization has diminishing returns: the first 10 hours might 10x performance, the next 10 hours might 2x. Know when to stop.

05

Load testing that doesn't match production traffic patterns is misleading—uniform tests miss the burst patterns that cause production incidents.

SaaS Regulations

Compliance requirements that shape technical architecture

Common Challenges

Problems I solve for clients in this space

Challenge

Unexplained slowness without visibility

The application is slow but nobody knows why. Developers guess at optimizations without evidence, sometimes making things worse.

Solution

Systematic profiling to identify actual bottlenecks. APM instrumentation for production visibility. Data-driven optimization targeting measured hot spots.

Challenge

Database query performance

Database queries that worked fine with small data become unacceptably slow at scale. ORM-generated queries hide inefficiencies.

Solution

Query analysis with EXPLAIN ANALYZE. Index optimization for actual query patterns. Query rewriting to eliminate N+1 patterns. Caching for repeated expensive queries.

Challenge

Inconsistent performance under load

Application performs well in development but degrades unpredictably under production load.

Solution

Load testing that mimics production patterns. Identification of resource contention and bottlenecks. Capacity planning based on actual characteristics.

Challenge

Infrastructure cost scaling

Scaling infrastructure to maintain performance becomes prohibitively expensive. More hardware doesn't proportionally improve performance.

Solution

Efficiency optimization to do more with existing resources. Architecture changes that scale horizontally without linear cost increase.

Recommended Stack

Optimal technology choices for TypeScript + SaaS

APM

Datadog or OpenTelemetry

Production visibility into request traces, database queries, and external calls. Essential for identifying real bottlenecks.

Database Profiling

pg_stat_statements, EXPLAIN ANALYZE

Query-level performance data identifying slow queries and missing indexes.

Load Testing

k6 or Artillery

Programmable load testing replicating production traffic patterns. Integration with monitoring for correlation.

Caching

Redis with TTL strategy

Multi-layer caching strategy. Redis for application data. CDN for static assets. Proper invalidation for correctness.

Why TypeScript?

Performance optimization is fundamentally about measurement. Intuition about what's slow is wrong often enough that optimizing without profiling wastes effort. The tooling stack makes performance visible—APM shows where time goes, database profiling reveals query inefficiencies, load testing exposes scaling limits. Most performance problems fall into predictable categories: database queries scanning entire tables, N+1 patterns fetching data one row at a time, missing caching for expensive computations, synchronous operations that could be async, unoptimized images. These patterns have known solutions—the skill is identifying which apply to your specific system. The goal isn't maximum performance; it's appropriate performance at reasonable cost. A 50ms response might be adequate; optimizing to 5ms might cost 10x engineering effort with no user benefit.

My Approach

Performance optimization engagements begin with baseline measurements. I instrument the application with APM, enable database query logging, and set up synthetic monitoring for critical flows. This produces the data for informed decisions. The profiling phase analyzes production data to identify actual bottlenecks. I look at P50, P95, and P99 latencies—the P99 often reveals problems invisible in averages. Database query analysis identifies slow queries and missing indexes. From profiling data, I create a prioritized optimization plan. Each item has estimated effort and expected impact. Highest-impact, lowest-effort items come first. Implementation follows the measure-optimize-verify loop. Each optimization is measured before and after. Changes that don't measurably improve performance get reverted. Load testing validates that optimizations hold under production-like load.

Expert Insights

Building TraceForge—a GPU-accelerated vector conversion pipeline—demonstrated what's possible when you measure obsessively and optimize surgically. A 337x speedup doesn't come from intuition; it comes from profiling.

Proven Results

Cut vector conversion time from 45 minutes to 8 seconds per asset—337x speedup
SVGO optimization stage reduces file sizes by 40-60%
Processing 2,000+ conversions monthly with zero manual intervention
GPU-accelerated pipeline combining neural upscaling with dual vectorization engines

Mistakes I Help You Avoid

Optimizing without profiling—intuition about bottlenecks is wrong more than half the time
Focusing on micro-optimizations instead of architectural changes—a cache or async job queue often beats code tweaks by 10x
Load testing with uniform traffic instead of realistic burst patterns—production incidents happen at peaks, not averages
Optimizing past the point of diminishing returns—know when good enough is good enough

Decision Frameworks I Use

  • Profiling before optimizing: measure P50, P95, P99 latencies to find actual bottlenecks, not assumed ones
  • Impact vs effort matrix: highest-impact, lowest-effort optimizations first—architectural wins before micro-optimizations
  • Cache strategy: multi-layer caching with proper invalidation beats single-layer caching every time

Investment Guidance

Typical budget ranges for TypeScript saas projects

MVP

$15,000 - $35,000

Core functionality, essential features, production-ready foundation

Full Solution

$40,000 - $100,000

Complete platform with advanced features, integrations, and scale

Factors affecting scope

  • System size and complexity
  • Current instrumentation state
  • Optimization scope (backend, database, frontend)
  • Load testing requirements

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Services

Related Topics

Explore related services in Performance Engineering

Performance Engineering

Ready to discuss your project?

Let's talk about how I can help architect a solution tailored to your specific requirements and constraints.

START_CONVERSATION()

Not ready to talk? Stay in the loop.